How Can Advertisers Benefit from Click Scoring?

Since click fraud detection is a rudimentary application of click scoring, one thinks of click scoring as a tool to eliminate unqualified traffic. Click scoring can actually do much more, such as determine optimum pricing associated with a click, identify new sources of potentially converting traffic, measure traffic quality in the absence of conversions or in the presence of bogus conversions, and assess the quality of distribution partners, to name a few applications. Also note that scoring is not limited to clicks but can also involve impressions and metrics such as clicks per impressions.

From the advertiser viewpoint, one important application of click scoring is to detect new sources of traffic to improve total revenue, in a way that can not be accomplished through A/B/C testing, traditional ROI optimization or SEO. The idea consists of tapping into delicately selected new traffic sources rather than improving existing ones.

Let us consider a framework where we have two types of scores:

• Score I: generic score computed using a pool of advertisers, possibly dozens of advertisers from the same category.
  
• Score II: customized score specific to a particular advertiser.
  

What can we do when we combine these two scores? Here's the solution:

1. Scores I and II are good. This is usually one of the two traffic segments that advertisers are considering. Typically advertisers focus their efforts on SEO or A/B testing to further refine the quality and gain a little edge.
   
2. Score I is good and score II is bad. This traffic is usually rejected. No effort is made to understand why the good traffic is not converting. Advertisers rejecting this traffic might miss major sources of revenue.
   
3. Score I is bad and score II is good. This is the other traffic segment that advertisers are considering. Unfortunately this situation makes advertisers happy: they are getting conversions. However this is a red flag, indicating that the conversions might be bogus. This happens frequently when conversions consist of filling web forms. Any attempt to improve conversions (e.g. through SEO) are counter-productive. Instead, the traffic should be seriously investigated.
   
4. Scores I and II are bad. Here, most of the time, the reaction consists of dropping the traffic source entirely and permanently. Again, this is a bad approach. By reducing the traffic using a schedule based on click scores, one can significantly lower exposure to bad traffic and at the same time not miss the opportunity when the traffic quality improves.
   

This discussion illustrates how scoring can help advertisers substantially improve their revenue.

Case Study
We have applied this concept to optimize the traffic on a partner website, where conversions consist of filling up a web form to subscribe to a newsletter.

• One source representing 25% of the traffic was producing negative results, even though the scores were very high. After investigating the case, we realized that the landing page was not targeted for the user segment in question. After modifying the content to better target these users, the website experienced a substantial page view increase and visit depth - and higher revenue. Eventually we decided to increase this source to 50% of the total traffic.
  
• Another source represented 2% of the paid clicks but 30% of the conversions from a major network. After investigation, all conversions (most of them, bogus) originating from this source were discarded, but the source continued to be monitored. Without this discovery, they would be sending newsletters to thousands of people who never actually subscribed, without knowing it (until complaints arrive).